Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. Mechanism for removing T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: No. You already said that it has no economic influence. Are you now saying that you were wrong? Please quote where Akita made such a claim. I can see several places where she made the exact opposite claim. I'm going to guess you a...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.22 18:13:00
|
162. Mechanism for removing T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 21/08/2010 23:05:24 All owners of T2 BPOs actually should see their precious T2 BPOs disappear. That is my opinion. Reasons: - EVE is just a game, get over it, loss is meaningful, T2...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.22 17:56:00
|
163. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nahkep Narmelion on 21/08/2010 17:12:03 Originally by: Allestin Villimar Edited by: Allestin Villimar on 18/08/2010 06:20:58 Originally by: Nahkep Narmelion Guess not then. My point was that you just killed your...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.21 17:08:00
|
164. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Guess not then. My point was that you just killed your own argument. You have correctly pointed out that AFK cloakers can't destroy anything...hence they are no threat to you. When they are a threat to you, you can also shoot them and try to kill...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.17 05:10:00
|
165. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Allestin Villimar Originally by: Robert Caldera having the ability of cleaning space of any hostiles for careless carebearing would be even less balanced, so its fine as it is. I wasn't aware you could destroy th...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.17 03:05:00
|
166. Corp Planets - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Nahkep Narmelion on 15/08/2010 20:53:45 I was doing the usual click-fest, looking at robotics prices and thinking damn prices are going up and will likely keep going up making it harder to run a POS and supply T2 items. Then in tal...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.15 20:54:00
|
167. Stealth bombers and the need for cloak detection - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: But problems arise when we get some random ****hat in a stealth bomber. He'll come into the system, get through bubbles easily by instantly cloaking, and then they can warp off into whatever safe spot and afk for hours. Not if he ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.15 20:49:00
|
168. Some Suggestions For Improving the Cloaking System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ayah Solaris I don't know if you've noticed, but the EVE cloaking system is a bit broken. It allows players to sit afk and cloaked in enemy systems for hours at a time - occasionally from DT to DT - during which time the min...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.15 20:43:00
|
169. Perhaps I've been thinking of the T2 BPO thing the wrong way. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: LHA Tarawa If T2 BPO lottery that gave massive rewards to very few players based on chance rather than hard work and dedication was not an error, then why was it replaced with the exact opposite? So, you are saying that EV...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.12 15:28:00
|
170. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Rikki Sals Originally by: Akita T ISK made / time ? A select few T2 BPOs make more than some of the better T1 BPOs, the vast majority of T2 BPO types doesn't even come close to the top of the T1 BPO ranking, and some...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.12 02:47:00
|
171. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Another moron who can't read joins the circus.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.03 07:51:00
|
172. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Voogru The primary reason the inventards want to get rid of T2 bpos is because they are in competition with them, and they believe that the T2 BPO owners hurt their profits. Increasing the amount of production that can be ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.08.03 02:42:00
|
173. To people that want to KEEP T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Ariane VoxDei, Please train reading lvl 1. Idiot.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.30 23:42:00
|
174. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jesus f***ing Christ the tard is strong in this thread. I've already pointed out that T2 BPO's have one benefit, keeping markets active where the profit margin is thin. Invention provides a competitive fringe to T2 BPOs thus keeping prices in che...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.30 22:22:00
|
175. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: T2 BPOs are detrimental because they create jealousy/envy/whatever.... Really, grow up please.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.30 03:00:00
|
176. Mechanism for removing T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Mandos2k Let's have a look at T2 BPOs and invention: T2 BPOs Once acquired there are no further costs. T2 BPOs are efficient as they have at least ME and PE levels of 0. Their ME and PE can be researched. T2 BPOs ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.30 02:54:00
|
177. Mechanism for removing T2 BPOs. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: LHA Tarawa Since we all know that T2 BPOs are a great evil that drive new players to emo rage quit the game, it is obvious that CCP needs to remove them. This is the best you can do? Really? I bet more players emo-rage-...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.29 03:49:00
|
178. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Qoi Full disclosure: happy inventor FWIW, me too. Leave T2 BPOs, as a I see no reason to remove them.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.29 03:27:00
|
179. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I'll even give a reason to keep t2 BPOs: markets where profits are too thin for invention. If the profit margin is too thin, inventors will move to other more profitable markets. In this case, the only people likely to keep that market alive are t...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.07.29 01:11:00
|
180. Mining is collapsing? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: sue denim Originally by: Khun SP The answer is so simple: make mining trickier. Current system is a cake, a boring cake... warp to asteroid field - which is available on overview you dont even need to scan - lock ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.06.29 20:14:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |